MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461631825

The flocculation mechanism of microparticulate retention aid systems

2001· article· en· W2461631825 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Asselman, Gil Garnier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontmorilloniteChemistryPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons analyse la cinetique de la deposition des fines sur les fibres de pâte a l'aide d'un sequestrant CPAM/bentonite (montmorillonite). Diverses configuration de formation de ponts CPAM/montmorillonite entre les fibres et les fines ont ete etudiees et comparees a des couches uniques de polymeres. Les resultats indiquent que les plaquettes accroissent la resistance des liaisons des couches de polymere adsorbees sur les fibres et les fines, et reduisent le transfert de polymere entre les surfaces. De plus, les plaquettes de montmorillonite sont des agents de formation de ponts efficaces entre les couches de polymere inactif. Le mecanisme de ces floculants est explique en terme de densite de charge de surface et de configuration des couches de polymere. Ces resultats fournissent des indications sur l'optimisation de ces systemes en usine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207