MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461693811 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.023

A Bi-criterion Flexible Registration Method for Fixtureless Inspection of Compliant Parts

2016· article· en· W2461693811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCADResidual stressSheet metalResidualEngineering drawingMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringAlgorithmMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manufactured mechanical parts such as sheet metal and thin-wall featured parts, often have significant geometrical differences compared to their nominal CAD models as they have a considerably different shape in a free state condition due to gravity and/or residual stress. Thus, expensive conformation fixtures are traditionally used during inspection operations. Naming such parts flexible (non-rigid or compliant), in this paper, a new method for avoiding fixtures is introduced. Validation was conducted on a virtual industrial case study typically produced with waterjet cutting. Obtained satisfactory results reflect the effectiveness and utility of this approach in precision detection of manufacturing defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it