MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2461699763 · doi:10.4038/cjs.v45i1.7359

Shedding light on plant development: light signalling in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana

2016· article· en· W2461699763 on OpenAlexaff
Dana F. Schroeder

Bibliographic record

VenueCeylon Journal of Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArabidopsis thalianaBiologyArabidopsisBotanyPhotomorphogenesisPlant developmentPlant biologyPhototropismGeneticsBlue lightGenePhysicsMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light is one of the most important factors regulating plant growth and development. Depending on the availability of light, seedlings undergo two different developmental programs namely photomorphogenesis in the presence of light, and skotomorphogenesis in the absence of light. In the model plant <em>Arabidopsis thaliana </em>mutants in light signalling path ways have been identified that misregulate this response. The mechanisms behind light and dark growth have been studied extensively and recent studies have revealed how light signals are perceived and transmitted to downstream components. This review provides insight into light-perceiving photoreceptors and other positive and negative regulators of light signalling as well as interactions between these components. Genetic and biochemical evidence for the basis of light signalling mechanisms are discussed as well as the importance of light signalling in plant development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCeylon Journal of ScienceSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207