MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dog Walking as Physical Activity and Multi-Level Correlates of Dog Walking among Adolescents

2015· article· en· W2461717986 on OpenAlexaff
Jessa K. Engelberg, Jordan Carlson, Terry L. Conway, Kelli L. Cain, Brian E. Saelens, Karen Glanz, Lawrence D. Frank, James F. Sallis

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialWalkabilityPhysical activityDemographyPsychologyMedicineGerontologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the association of dog ownership and dog walking with moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and BMI among adolescents and examine correlates of dog walking. METHODS: Participants were adolescents (n=928) from the Baltimore, MD and Seattle, WA regions, ages 12-17 years. Measures included 7 days of accelerometer monitoring, GIS measures of the built environment, and surveys of psychosocial and environment characteristics. Minutes/day of MVPA and BMI were compared among adolescents (1) without a dog (n=441) and those with a dog who (2) do (n=300) or (3) do not (n=184) walk it. Among adolescents with a dog (n=484), models assessed relations between dog walking (days/week) and (1) demographic, (2) psychosocial (physical activity self-efficacy), (3) home environment (electronic device ownership), (4) perceived neighborhood environment, and (5) objective neighborhood walkability factors. All models were adjusted for participant demographic factors. RESULTS: Adolescent dog walkers obtained 4-5 more minutes/day of MVPA than those with dogs but were non-dog-walkers (p=.044) and those who lived in non-dog households (p=.025). Adolescents who walked their dog were more likely to have a more educated parent (p=.056), own more personal electronics (p=.047), have better perceived neighborhood aesthetics (p=.016), live in a more walkable neighborhood (p=.045), and live in a multifamily home (p =0.003) compared to adolescents with dogs who did not walk them. Adolescents’ age interacted with physical activity self-efficacy (p=.045) and perceived neighborhood aesthetics (p<.001), where self-efficacy and aesthetics were positively associated with dog walking among younger adolescents and not associated in older adolescents. Adolescent BMI was not associated with dog walking or dog ownership. CONCLUSIONS: Dog walking was an important contributor to overall MVPA, where dog walkers obtained 7-8% more minutes/day of MVPA than those who did not walk them, and correlates of dog walking were found at multiple levels of influence. Results suggest interventions to increase dog walking at the environmental and psychosocial levels are worthy of evaluation, particularly given that nearly 50% of US households own dogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207