Central Nystagmus Induced by Deep‐Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to describe the localization of central nystagmus induced as a side effect of electrical deep-brain stimulation for epilepsy. METHODS: Bilateral deep-brain stimulating electrodes were inserted in the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus to control seizures in a patient with intractable epilepsy. RESULTS: Cathodal high-frequency stimulation through the deepest contact of each electrode elicited cycles of slow ipsiversive conjugate eye deviations, each followed by rapid contralateral jerks. The involved electrode contacts were situated at the mesodiencephalic junction just inferior to the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus and rostral to the superior colliculus. Right-sided stimulation evoked left beating nystagmus and left-sided stimulation evoked right beating nystagmus. Stimulation through other electrode contacts did not induce nystagmus. Electronystagmography showed the nystagmus to have constant velocity slow phases. CONCLUSIONS: A central nystagmogenic area exists in humans that appears to be homologous to the nucleus of the optic tract, a region described in nonhuman primates to play a role in the generation of optokinetic nystagmus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".