Bibliographic record
Abstract
By September 1949, the CCP had clearly defeated the GMD and set about establishing its new government, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Part of that system, drawing on the promise of a united front of Communists and non-Communists made in Mao’s 1940 “On New Democracy” (see Document 2), was the formation of the Chinese Political Consultative Congress, which brought together a range of left-wing and independent parties willing to work with the new CCP government. This selection comes from Mao’s speech at the preparatory session of the Consultative Congress. The tone of the speech is celebratory. After decades of turmoil and the near eradication of the CCP, victory was at hand. Mao’s themes are nationalist rather than socialist; he dwells on China’s new prestige and its national success in throwing off the Japanese, the Europeans (referred to as imperialists), and the corrupt government of the GMD. This was the high point of Mao’s popular prestige, because he was widely seen as the savior who had delivered China’s hard-earned independence and stature. Yet Mao hints at the continuing need to maintain “vigilance” against unnamed “reactionaries,” leaving the door open for the terrible political purges and mass campaigns of the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".