Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Cronobacter isolated from Powdered Infant Formula Retailed in Nigeria
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><em>Cronobacter</em> is a genus with emerging pathogens that has been associated with life threatening diseases in neonates, infants and immunocompromised adults. Three <em>Cronobacter </em>species were isolated from powdered infant formula retailed in Nigeria. Different methods of phenotypic and genotypic characterization were carried out. All the isolates were identified biochemically by Microscan identification analysis as <em>Enterobacter sakazakii</em> (98.87%)<em>. </em>The Vitek MALDI-TOF system identified the isolates as <em>Cronobacter sakazakii.</em> 16S rRNA sequencing identified the isolates as <em>C. sakazakii. </em>In contrast the use of species-specific PCR assays targeting <em>rpo</em>B<em>, </em>and<em> cgc</em>A<em>, </em>helped to identify two of the three strains as<em> C. sakazakii </em>and the last strain was identified as<em> C. malonaticus. </em>Multi locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis was used to identify each strain’s sequence type and the results identified three new sequence types: 303, 304 and 296. <em>C. sakazakii</em> BAA 894 served as a positive control for all the experiments. Biochemical methods and commercial identification systems are not sensitive enough to identify <em>Cronobacter </em>strains to the species level. Molecular methods are needed to confirm the species identity of strains.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it