[Encounter of cancer cells with bone. Histological examination of bone metastasis].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Management of the cancer bone metastasis is important clinical problem. The mechanism (s) of bone metastasis has been studied mainly by animal models and in vitro system. There might be discrepancy between model systems and in vivo human clinical materials. But there is surprisingly rare study of histological examination of human skeletal metastasis, since it is hard to obtain human materials without modification by chemotherapy or irradiation. There are many surgical materials suitable for this examination in our hospital and we have been examined histological features of them. Stromal cells between metastatic cancer cells and OCs (osteoclasts) and÷or OBs (osteoblasts) might play a role in bone metastasis, since these cells are frequently accompanied with OCs÷OBs. We called these stromal cells as "fibroblast-like cells" and examined their nature and roles in bone metastasis. We hope these fibroblast-like cells might become the target of anti bone metastasis therapy, same as osteoclasts targeted by bisphosphonates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".