Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si le nomade peut etre appele le Deterritorialise par Deleuze and Guattari write, c'est justement parce que la reterritorialisation ne se fait pas apres comme chez le [If the nomad can be called the Deterritorialized par excellence, it is precisely because there is no reterritorialization afterward as with the migrant].1 In this paper, however, I am interested in Dany Laferriere as a nomadic migrant writer.2 Like other contemporary francophone migrant writers, such as Flora Balzano, Mehdi Charef, Linda Le, and Leila Sebbar, Laferriere deliberately resists definitive location and deterritorializes the derive and deracinement of the nomad. By resisting location, nomadic migrant writers also elude the fixity of the identity categories by which the country of adoption attempts to define them-le negre ['the black'], le migrant ['the migrant'], I'autre ['the other']. Laferriere is rootless and adrift, but also a deterritorializing force within Quebec that aspires to sovereignty and nationality and within the U.S., increasingly multicultural and transnational. He writes out the diasporic and exilic dislocations of nomadism: linguistic, geopolitical and schizo-social. Laferriere-deracinated (deracine), drifting (derivant), deterritorializing (deterritorialisant). Having worked as a journalist in Baby Doc Duvalier's Haiti in the early 1970s, Laferriere fled the country after one of his colleagues was found dead. In Chronique de la de'rive douce [Drifting Year], Laferrir I fled before they could kill me. That's different] (Chronique 27/25). Throughout Chronique, an account of his first year in Quebec, Laferriere, who now lives in Miami, resists the possibility of establishing roots in the pays d'accueil, yet he also frustrates the possibility of return to the pays natal:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".