Taxol (paclitaxel) involution of articular cartilage destruction in collagen induced arthritis: an ultrastructural demonstration of an increased superficial chondroprotective layer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the ultastructural changes of Taxol (paclitaxel) involution of articular cartilage destruction in collagen induced arthritis (CIA) and to compare with articular cartilage from normal rats. METHODS: Forty-five Louvain rats were randomized to one of 3 protocols for structural analysis: (1) control group, (2) CIA group, and (3) Taxol treated CIA group. The latter group received 10 mg/kg body weight of Taxol at Days 10, 12, and 14 and 7.5 mg/kg body weight of Taxol on Days 16, 18, and 20 postimmunization with collagen type II. Eight days later, each group was examined by light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: In Taxol treated rats, the morphology of the articular cartilage reverted to that observed in naive rats except for a striking increase in the thickness of the superficial amorphous layer covering the articular surface. CONCLUSION: The involution of CIA by Taxol suggests that this agent may be useful in the clinical treatment of RA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".