MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462520798 · doi:10.1109/noms.2016.7502804

Autonomous system based flow marking scheme for IP-Traceback

2016· article· en· W2462520798 on OpenAlexafffund
Vahid Aghaei-Foroushani, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIP tracebackComputer scienceIP address spoofingComputer networkSpoofing attackNetwork packetCorrectnessTracingDenial-of-service attackLoose Source RoutingComputer securityThe InternetInternet ProtocolIP address managementRouting protocolOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tracing IP packets to their sources, known as IP-Traceback, is a critical task in defending against IP spoofing and DoS attacks. There are several solutions to traceback to the origin of the attack. However, all these solutions require either all routers or ISPs to support the same IP-Traceback mechanism. To address this limitation, we propose an IP-Traceback approach at the level of autonomous systems, called Autonomous System-based Flow Marking, ASFM, to identify some key locations in the path where attacker packets are being forwarded. ASFM employs the BGP update message community attribute that enables information to be passed across ASs even if they are not necessarily involved in the IP-Traceback scheme. We also propose an authentication method, so a downstream AS can examine the correctness of the marking provided by the upstream ASs, thus eliminating the fake marking embedded by subverted routers. Finally, we evaluate and analyze the performance of our proposal, using real life datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207