Digitally enhanced? An examination of the the information behaviours of visually impaired postsecondary students.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des entrevues qualitatives en profondeur ont ete effectuees afin d'examiner les comportements informationnels universitaires des etudiants malvoyants de 1 er cycle, et plus specifiquement la technologie adaptative. Les resultats preliminaires revelent que les comportements informationnels des etudiants sont ameliores par la technologie, les reseaux actifs de soutien, et la determination personnelle des etudiants. Les resultats demontrent egalement que les etudiants luttent contre les contraintes de temps, le sentiment de dependance, le manque de comprehension de la part d'autrui et l'acces limite au materiel electronique. L'article explore les possibilites d'ameliorations pour les services de bibliotheque, incluant les echanges entre bibliotheques des ressources adaptees (par exemple, le materiel braille) et la creation de services facilitant les comportements informationnels des etudiants malvoyants, tout en maintenant l'independance personnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".