MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462576251 · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrw017

Introduction to the Special Issue on the transition to mathematically demanding programmes in higher education

2016· article· en· W2462576251 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Laura Black, Julian Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics Education and Programs
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTrent UniversityNottingham Trent University
KeywordsTheme (computing)Transition (genetics)Work (physics)Mathematics educationEngineering ethicsBase (topology)Computer scienceManagement scienceEngineeringPsychologyMathematicsChemistryWorld Wide WebMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this editorial we explain the background to the research papers reported in this special issue, and to some extent how each paper relates to this body of work. In particular we outline the research projects and research teams that worked together between 2006 and 2014 on projects that related to the theme of transition, and we provide the knowledge base on which these papers build.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMASame topicMathematics Education and ProgramsFrench-language works237,207