MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462710070 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2589941

A Space Virtual-Vector Modulation With Voltage Balance Control for Nested Neutral-Point Clamped Converter Under Low Output Frequency Conditions

2016· article· en· W2462710070 on OpenAlexaff
Longcheng Tan, Bin Wu, Mehdi Narimani, Dewei Xu, Jin Liu, Zhongyuan Cheng, Navid R. Zargari

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)McMaster UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace vector modulationVoltageCapacitorControl theory (sociology)CapacitanceModulation (music)Pulse-width modulationSupport vector machinePower (physics)EngineeringElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)Acoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recently-developed nested neutral-point clamped (NNPC) converter is a four-level converter for medium-voltage high-power applications. It has some merits such as operating over wide voltage ranges (2.4–7.2 kV) without switching devices in series and less diodes or capacitors when compared with classical four-level topologies. But it has severe voltage balancing problems under low output frequency conditions when conventional space vector modulation (SVM) or sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) is applied, which limits its wide applications. In order to solve this issue, a space virtual-vector modulation (SVVM) along with a voltage balance control (VBC) algorithm is proposed in this paper. It helps reduce the voltage ripples greatly and maintain them within an acceptable region under low output frequency conditions. Therefore, it guarantees even voltage stresses among switching devices and extends the NNPC converter's applications. Principles of the proposed SVVM and VBC algorithms are elaborated in detail, and the voltage balancing performance is investigated and compared with the cases where conventional SVM and SPWM with the same VBC are applied. The relationship curves between voltage ripples and flying capacitance, output power, and output frequency have been explored and compared for both conventional SVM and proposed SVVM. Simulation and experimental results are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207