Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo ilustra os principais fundamentos da educacao inclusiva e equitavel. Elesitua, primeiramente, seus grandes “principios de acao” e abre a reflexao sobre odesenvolvimento de indicadores pela pratica de um processo de equidade e deinclusao no meio escolar. Salienta-se tambem o papel central das competenciasprofissionais na formacao inicial e continua dos profissionais de educacao no Quebec,em uma perspectiva de equidade e de inclusao. O artigo acentua tambem o“paradigma comum” que liga as diferentes correntes sobre a diversidade etnocultural,religiosa e linguistica na educacao, especialmente as abordagens antirracistae inclusiva. Na conclusao, sao ponderados dois grandes desafios quanto a aplicacaode uma abordagem inclusiva institucional no Quebec.Palavras-chave: Diversidade etnocultural, religiosa e linguistica. Equidade. EducacaoInclusao. Indicadores. Competencias profissionais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".