MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2462848888 · doi:10.1021/bk-2009-1000.ch012

The Twelve Principles of Green Chemistry

2008· book-chapter· en· W2462848888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemistry and Chemical Engineering
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)DozenField (mathematics)Engineering ethicsEngineeringPath (computing)Management scienceBiochemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComputer scienceEngineering managementMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this, the centenary year of the Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Division, we present a dozen short essays, one for each of the 12 principles of green chemistry. These principles were first articulated in 1998 as a set of tools to help the design scientist to anticipate downstream issues at the earliest stage of an R&D effort. Recognizing that most materials scientists lack the formal training necessary to deal with issues related to human health, the environment, and regulatory implications, the twelve principles serve to provide a path forward in designing products and processes that would be less environmentally damaging while maintaining or enhancing product performance and economic cost. Designing processes to minimize environmental impact has become, in recent years, essential to industrial and engineering chemistry, and is likely to shape the field for the next 100 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it