MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects of a Seven Day High-Fat Diet on Oral Glucose Tolerance and Endothelial Function in Young Males

2015· article· en· W2462977451 on OpenAlexaff
Cody Durrer, Zhongxiao Wan, Nia C. S. Lewis, Philip N. Ainslie, Nathan T. Jenkins, Jonathan P. Little

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineIngestionGlucose tolerance testEndothelial dysfunctionDiabetes mellitusInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consumption of a high-fat diet (HFD) has been shown to impair glucose homeostasis, glucose tolerance and vascular endothelial function. However, the relationships between these variables is not clear. PURPOSE: To examine the hypothesis that a seven-day HFD would induce relative glucose intolerance which would exacerbate hyperglycemia-induced impairments in endothelial function. METHODS: Nine males (21±3 yrs) were fed a diet consisting of ∼70% fat, ∼15% protein, and ∼15% carbohydrates that was isocaloric to their usual intake. Glucose tolerance was assessed before (pre-) and after (post-) the HFD by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Pre- and post-HFD, endothelial function was assessed by flow mediated dilation (FMD) in the fasted state before and one hour after the OGTT. Endothelial microparticles (EMPs), an established circulating biomarker for endothelial damage, were also measured at similar times points to the FMD test by flow cytometry. RESULTS: One week of a HFD induced relative glucose intolerance, indicated by higher peak glucose and two-hour area under the glucose curve (both P<0.05). Both before and after the HFD, acute glucose ingestion significantly reduced FMD when compared to the fasting state (pre-HFD fast: 7.9±0.9%; pre-HFD OGTT: 7.2±0.9%; post-HFD fast: 7.2±0.8%; post-HFD OGTT: 6.7±0.8%; main effect of OGTT, P<0.05). FMD was also significantly reduced (by ~8%) post-HFD when compared to pre-HFD (main effect of HFD, P<0.05). Although acute glucose ingestion had no effect on EMPs when assessed pre-HFD, there was a significant increase in both CD62E+ (+88%) and CD31+/CD42b- (+258%) EMPs one hour following glucose ingestion post-HFD, at the time point that corresponded to the reduction in FMD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a short-term HFD leads relative glucose intolerance and reduction in FMD in young males. The increase in EMPs and reduction in FMD following glucose ingestion post-HFD suggests that the HFD rendered the endothelium susceptible to hyperglycemia-induced damage and impaired dilatory capacity. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in at risk populations and determine whether EMPs are a useful biomarker of hyperglycemia-related endothelial damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→