Modélisation de la relation entre certaines variables caractéristiques de l’élève et de l’école et la performance à l’écrit en français des finissants du secondaire au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse les relations entre certaines variables associées à l’élève et à l’école et la performance à l’écrit en français des élèves québécois finissants du secondaire de la région métropolitaine de Montréal, en ce qui a trait à deux des critères de correction : la syntaxe et la ponctuation ainsi que l’orthographe. À l’aide de la modélisation multiniveau multivariée, les résultats indiquent que la part de variance dans la performance des élèves attribuable à l’élève est de l’ordre de 75,0 %, tandis que celle attribuable à l’école est de l’ordre de 25,0 % pour l’ensemble des élèves. Nous observons un effet différentiel des facteurs d’élève et d’école selon le critère considéré, et une plus grande homogénéité entre les écoles qu’entre les élèves à l’intérieur d’une école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".