MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463015322 · doi:10.5580/14e8

Effect of Erbium:YAG Laser Treatment on Scar Pain

2004· article· en· W2463015322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Internet Journal of Anesthesiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineErbiumLaserSurgeryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scar pain has persisted as a significant problem for patients who have undergone surgery or suffered trauma. The pain may vary from what is described as irritation or itching to severe neuropathic pain. Recent work by dermatologists using lasers to treat scars for cosmetic reasons has revealed that there has been pain relief from the cosmetic laser treatment. This study examined the effect of a single erbium:YAG laser treatment on 23 patients with chronic (>6 months) scar pain. Assessment was at one month and four months post treatment. Results showed a significant and persistent decrease in McGill Pain Scale, Itch Visual Analog Scale, and Pain Intensity Scale. Treatment of chronic scar pain with readily available cosmetic lasers may be of significant benefit to patients who have not responded to standard injection therapy. This research was funded by the Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center—Shreveport. Presented in part at the Joint International Laser Conference, September 21-23, 2003, Edinburgh, Scotland. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Scar pain may persist chronically after surgery or accidental trauma. Entrapment of neurons by collagen has been considered the most probable cause.1 Treatment has included infiltration with local anesthetic agents, steroids, electrical stimulation, and needles, all of which usually provide only short-term relief. An incidental finding in a study of cosmetic laser treatment of scars showed significant pain relief for four patients who also had pain.2 The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a single treatment with an erbium:YAG laser on chronic scar pain. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS After approval by the IRB at LSUHSC-Shreveport and informed consent, 23 patients with a history of chronic (>3 months) scar pain were studied. Demographic data collected included age, weight, height, sex, Fitzpatrick Scale (skin color), type of injury (accidental vs surgical), and location of scar. The Fitzpatrick Scale assesses skin color: A score of 1 represents very light skin, and a score of 5 represents very dark skin. Baseline assessments included McGill Pain Score (Figure 1), including sensory and affective pain descriptors, VAS pain scale, VAS itching scale, and a 5-point numerical intensity scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=discomforting, 3=distressing, 4=horrible, and 5=excruciating). Figure 1 Figure 1: McGill Short Form.3 Yellow are sensory attributes; orange are affective attributes. All patients were treated with an Er:YAG laser (NaturaLaseTM, Focus Medical, Bethel, CT)(Figure 2), wavelength 2.94 nm, fluence 1.29 J/cm, spot size 8 mm, with 2 pulses per second, and 50% overlap. Assessment was at one month and four months post-procedure. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance, and a priori level of significance was defined at p When Manuskiatti, et al, studied the cosmetic effects of lasers on scars, they noted in passing that four of the patients they studied had complained of scar pain prior to the cosmetic treatment, but that after the treatment, the scars not only looked better, but the pain had vanished.2 They used a 585-nm pulsed-dye laser in their study. Kotani, et al1 hypothesized that nerve ending were entrapped by the formation of scar, causing the scar pain. If this is true, the laser could be simply destroying the collagen and causing it to regrow in a manner such that it no longer constricts the nerve ending. Recently, Martin has proposed that the laser may reduce directly chronic inflammation at the cellular level.4 Whatever the physics and physiology, cosmetic lasers are ubiquitous, and their potential application by anesthesiologists and pain medicine specialists to treat chronic scar pain represents a real breakthrough in this difficult area of pain medicine. CONCLUSION The Erb:YAG laser shows significant promise as a treatment modality for chronic scar pain. References 1. Kotani N, Kushikata T, Suzuki A, Hashimoto H, Muraoka M, Matsuki A: Insertion of intradermal needles into painful points provides analgesia for intractable abdominal scar pain. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 26(6):532-8, 2001 Nov-Dec. 2. Manuskiatti W, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP: Energy density and numbers of treatment affect response of keloidal and hypertrophic sternotomy scars to the 585-nm flashlamp- pumped pulsed-dye laser. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 45(4):557-65,2001 Oct. 3. Melzack R: The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 30(2):191-7, 1987 Aug. 4. Martin R: Laser-accelerated inflammation/pain reduction and healing. Practical Pain Management. 3(6):20-25, 2003 Nov/Dec. Effect of Erbium:YAG Laser Treatment on Scar Pain 5 of 5 Author Information Randall C. Cork, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center Lori Alexander, B.S., M.B.A. Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center Clifton Shepherd, M.D. Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center Alejandro Porrata, M.D. Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center Norbert Ming, M.D. Department of Anesthesiology, LSU Health Sciences Center

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Internet Journal of AnesthesiologySame topicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207