MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463133265 · doi:10.1134/s0032945208110040

Spawning behavior of lenok, Brachymystax lenok (Salmoniformes) from the Uur River, Northern Mongolia

2008· article· en· W2463133265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ichthyology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZoologySalmonidaeFisheryEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video cameras inside underwater housings were used to record the spawning activities of lenok (sharp snout type) in the Uur River, Hovsgol Province (Northern Mongolia). This study constitutes the first underwater video recordings of lenok spawning in the wild. A qualitative description of spawning behavior is presented based on observations taken from five females. Our observations indicate that a previously reported lenok-specific behavior, the presence of satellite females, may have been based on a misidentification of female-mimicking males. Immediately after spawning, lenok females rest before covering their eggs. They share this unusual trait with Hucho taimen, although we cannot determine the pattern of “resting” evolution until we have a more robust phylogeny for the Salmonidae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it