Chlorine Functionalization of a Model Phenolic C8-Guanine Adduct Increases Conformational Rigidity and Blocks Extension by a Y-Family DNA Polymerase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certain phenoxyl radicals can attach covalently to the C8-site of 2'-deoxyguanosine (dG) to afford oxygen-linked C8-dG adducts. Such O-linked adducts can be chemically synthesized through a nucleophilic displacement reaction between a phenolate and a suitably protected 8-Br-dG derivative. This permits the generation of model O-linked C8-dG adducts on scales suitable for insertion into oligonucleotide substrates using solid-phase DNA synthesis. Variation of the C8-aryl moiety provides an opportunity to derive structure-activity relationships on adduct conformation in duplex DNA and replication bypass by DNA polymerases. In the current study, the influence of chlorine C8-dG functionalization on in vitro DNA replication by Klenow fragment exo(-) (Kf(-)) and the Y-family polymerase (Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4)) has been determined. Model O-linked C8-dG adducts derived from the pentachlorophenoxyl radical ([PCP]G) and 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxyl radical ([TCP]G) were inserted into the reiterated G3-position of the NarI sequence (12-mer, NarI(12); and 22-mer, NarI(22)), which is a known hotspot for frameshift mutations mediated by N-linked polycyclic C8-dG adducts in bacterial mutagenesis. Within the NarI(12) duplex, the unsubstituted C8-phenoxy-dG ([PhO]G) adduct adopts a minimally perturbed B-form helix. Chlorination of [PhO]G to afford [PCP]G does not significantly change the adduct conformation within the NarI(12) duplex, as predicted by molecular dynamics simulations. However, when using NarI(22) for DNA synthesis in vitro, the chlorinated [PCP]G and [TCP]G lesions significantly block DNA replication by Kf(-) and Dpo4, whereas [PhO]G is readily bypassed. These findings highlight the impact that chlorine substituents impart to bulky C8-dG lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".