MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463386816 · doi:10.21037/jtd.2016.06.42

Ameliorating acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: do high dose perioperative statins play a role?

2016· letter· en· W2463386816 on OpenAlexaff
Janet M.C. Ngu, Munir Boodhwani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Disease · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeAcute kidney injurySurgeryKidneyAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is relatively common in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Over the past decade, several consensus definitions (namely the RIFLE, AKIN and KIDGO) have been developed to provide uniform criteria for the diagnosis of AKI, in order to facilitate comparisons between studies and the development of quantitative research (1-3). The incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery differs slightly depending on the classification criteria, ranging from 31–46% (3-5). It is well known that patients who developed AKI after cardiac surgery are at an increased risk of short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality. These patients tend to have higher mortality rates, prolonged ICU and hospital stay (5-7). These patients also have an increased risk of subsequent developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is associated with a higher long-term mortality (8).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0100.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic DiseaseSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207