Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Dans la presente etude, les auteurs proposent une reflexion sur le role essentiel des juristes dans la realisation de la securite alimentaire pour tous ainsi que sur la complementarite entre le droit a l’alimentation et la securite alimentaire. D’une part, le droit a l’alimentation qui, en droit international, fait partie integrante des droits fondamentaux de la personne, participe au fondement meme de la securite alimentaire. D’autre part, le concept de securite alimentaire permet de mettre en evidence les mesures concretes — dont les mesures juridiques — necessaires a la realisation du droit de chacun a l’alimentation. Ainsi, dans une perspective plus instrumentale, l’ordre juridique peut concourir par de multiples mecanismes a la realisation de la securite alimentaire en favorisant la disponibilite, l’accessibilite et la consommation securitaire de la nourriture. Afin d’illustrer la fonction instrumentale du droit dans la realisation de la securite alimentaire, les auteurs proposent l’exemple du droit des autochtones qui joue un role important dans la mise en place de mecanismes favorisant l’acces des populations autochtones a leurs sources de nourriture traditionnelle. Par la mise en lumiere de l’importance de la securite alimentaire et du role du droit dans sa realisation, les auteurs esperent encourager une contribution elargie des juristes a la comprehension des enjeux de la securite alimentaire dans leur domaine respectif.English Abstract: In this paper, the authors set forth their thinking on the essential role played by legal scholars in the achievement of food security for all peoples and on the complementarity of the human right to food and food security. On the one hand, the human right to food that in international law is an integral part of basic human rights is a part and parcel of food security. On the other, the concept of food security makes it possible to emphasize the tangible measures, including legal initiatives needed to attain each individual’s right to food. Thus, from a more instrumental viewpoint, the legal system may contribute in many ways to bring about food security by favouring the availability, accessibility and secure consumption of food. To illustrate the instrumental function of law instigating food security, the authors propose the example of aboriginal law, which plays an important role in implementing the means favouring aboriginal peoples’ access to their traditional sources of food. By shedding light on the importance of food security and the role played by law in achieving such security, the authors hope to encourage an even greater contribution of legal scholars to understanding what is at stake in their respective fields with regard to food security.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".