MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463958118 · doi:10.7202/1036574ar

Les recours possibles de l’acheteur à l’encontre des pratiques de contrainte à la fidélité ou à la surconsommation (PCFS) en droit de la vente

2016· article· fr· W2463958118 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marc-Étienne O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue générale de droit · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Contract Law
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La société de consommation a engendré des pratiques de nature à la sustenter. Parmi celles-ci, les pratiques de contrainte à la fidélité ou à la surconsommation (par exemple, l’obsolescence programmée) figurent au premier rang. Ces pratiques exercent sur l’acheteur une contrainte non seulement illégitime, mais aussi illégale : elles constituent ou engendrent des vices du contrat et des manquements aux obligations du vendeur. Le présent article met en relief les recours possibles de l’acheteur avant d’évaluer l’opportunité d’une intervention législative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue générale de droitSame topicEuropean and International Contract LawFrench-language works237,207