MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2463992612 · doi:10.4000/itineraires.2956

ἦθος, éthè intrinsèque et extrinsèque, éthos transformatif : l’éthogramme de l’ordre naturel dans les jeux de rôle goréens de Second Life

2016· article· fr· W2463992612 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Duret

Bibliographic record

VenueItinéraires · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthosPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article abordera le concept d’éthos tel qu’il s’illustre dans les jeux de rôle goréens de Second Life, dans la lignée de la rhétorique procédurale d’Ian Bogost et de l’éthos ludique de Sébastien Genvo. Il sera entendu comme le garant de la conformité des jeux goréens avec une doctrine appelée la « loi de l’ordre naturel ». Une analyse des éthè intrinsèque et extrinsèque des jeux goréens sera proposée à l’aide d’un éthogramme focalisant sur l’image du guerrier et de l’esclave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueItinérairesSame topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207