MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464082415 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22551

PI controller design for a TITO system based on delay compensated structure and direct synthesis

2016· article· en· W2464082415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Transfer functionPID controllerCompensation (psychology)Controller (irrigation)Process (computing)Computer scienceFunction (biology)MathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Temperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present study suggests a new scheme to design a decentralized PI controller for two‐input two‐output (TITO) processes. The decentralized controller is obtained from the direct synthesis method. The decoupler is derived from a modified decoupler and minimizes the interaction between the loops. Then a new reduced method based on equivalent transfer function (ETF) with relative gain array concept and relative normalized relative gain array concept reduces the decoupled process transfer functions to first‐order plus time delay (FOPTD) forms. Further, two PI controllers are obtained in the proposed delay‐compensated configuration in terms of the only parameter in every individual loop for the FOPTD transfer functions. Three illustrative examples demonstrate that the performance is verified on the original interactive system and show the effectiveness of the proposed design method. The results confirm the superior performance of the proposed compensation configuration in nominal and robust cases. The proposed method also offers several important advantages compared to other previous methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it