MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464135269 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0427

Study of molecular aggregation effects on the nonlinear refractive index and absorption of Oxazin 720 laser dye

2016· article· en· W2464135269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karim Milanchian, H. Tajalli, Zahra Eyni, M.S. Zakerhamidi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaturation (graph theory)Refractive indexAbsorption (acoustics)Aqueous solutionAcetoneDye laserNonlinear opticsLaserAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Z-scan techniqueDimethyl sulfoxideOpticsMaterials scienceChemistryChromatographyPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this experimental work, nonlinear optical properties of Oxazine 720 laser dye in acetone, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol, and water were studied using the z-scan method. It is found that the nonlinear behavior of Oxazine 720 dye in water is different from other organic solvents. The magnitude of the nonlinear refractive index was obtained in the order of 10−8 and 10−7 cm2/W for the 0.2 mmol/L solutions of this dye in water and other solvents, respectively. Also, it was observed that, in the aqueous solution, reverse saturation absorption occurs while, in other organic solvents, saturation absorption occurs and, near the focal point of the lens, it is converted to reverse saturation absorption. These differences in the nonlinear refractive index and nonlinear absorption changes of aqueous solution and other solutions may be due to strong aggregative behavior of dye molecules in water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials StudiesFrench-language works237,207