MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464159055 · doi:10.1558/jrff.v5i1.22786

‘Ancient’ Tensions and Local Circumstances

2015· article· en· W2464159055 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bonnie Huskins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for Research into Freemasonry and Fraternalism · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaSettlement (finance)HistoryAncient historyGenealogyArchaeologyEthnologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many American Revolutionary War Loyalists who migrated to Shelburne Nova Scotia were Ancient freemasons, who attempted to transplant fraternal rituals and traditions in their new community. Unfortunately the civilian lodges that they established proved to be short-lived. This case study of Shelburne provides historians with an opportunity to analyse why masonic lodges sometimes fail. In Shelburne, this may attributed to local factors, most significantly a socio-economic decline which hit the settlement almost immediately upon arrival. But the fractiousness of one of the lodges, Solomon’s Lodge No. 5 Provincial, is also a reflection of a broader tension within Ancient freemasonry between universal brotherhood and self-interest. Only further research will corroborate whether this pattern also extended to other Loyalist lodges in Nova Scotia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for Research into Freemasonry and FraternalismSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207