Abstract 13631: Therapeutic Inhibition of Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species With Mito-tempo Reduces Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The mitochondria are important sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the heart. Mitochondrial ROS production and subsequent oxidative damage have been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized that therapeutic strategies specifically targeting mitochondrial ROS may have benefit in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that therapeutic inhibition of mitochondrial ROS with mito-TEMPO reduces diabetic cardiomyopathy. Methods: The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mito-TEMPO was administrated after diabetes onset in a mouse model of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type-1 diabetes and type-2 diabetic db/db mice. Cardiac adverse changes were analyzed and myocardial function assessed. Cultured adult cardiomyocytes were stimulated with high glucose, and single mitochondrial superoxide generation and cell death were measured. Results: Incubation with high glucose increased mitochondria superoxide generation in cultured adult cardiomyocytes, which was prevented by mito-TEMPO. Co-incubation with mito-TEMPO also abrogated high glucose-induced cell death. Mitochondrial ROS generation, and intracellular ROS formation and oxidative damage were induced in both type-1 and type-2 diabetic mouse hearts. Daily injection of mito-TEMPO for 30 days inhibited mitochondrial ROS generation, prevented intracellular ROS formation and oxidative damage, decreased apoptosis and reduced myocardial hypertrophy in diabetic hearts without change of blood glucose, leading to improvement of myocardial function in both type-1 and type-2 diabetic mice. Mechanistic study revealed that the protective effects of mito-TMEPO were associated with down-regulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in diabetic hearts and high glucose-stimulated cardiomyocytes. Conclusions: Therapeutic inhibition of mitochondrial ROS by mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mito-TEMPO reduced adverse cardiac changes and mitigated myocardial dysfunction in both type-1 and type-2 diabetic mice. Thus, mitochondria-targeted antioxidants may be an effective therapy for diabetic cardiac complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".