MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Acute Response to High Intensity and Moderate Intensity Exercise in Adults with Confirmed Airway Hyperresponsivness

2016· article· en· W2464234936 on OpenAlexaff
Carley O’Neill, Shilpa Dogra

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensity (physics)AirwayMedicineExercise intensityInternal medicinePhysical therapyAudiologyCardiologyAnesthesiaPhysicsHeart rateOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise can induce bronchoconstriction in those with airway hyperresponsivness (AHR). This is thought to result from an increase in ventilation during exercise. High intensity interval exercise (HIIE) consists of intermittent recovery periods, which may allow for ventilation to recover and minimize bronchoconstriction. PURPOSE: To determine the acute response to HIIE, moderate intensity interval exercise (MIIE) and moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in adults with confirmed AHR. METHODS: AHR was confirmed in 9 participants (age: 21.1 ± 3.2 years) by a ≥10% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following a eucapnic voluntary hyperventilation challenge. Participants completed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer; peak power output (PPO) was used to determine exercise intensity. Participants completed the HIIE (90% PPO for 1 minute, 10% PPO for 1 minute, repeated 10 times), MIIE (65% PPO for 1 minute, 10% PPO for 1 minute, repeated 10 times), and MICE (65% PPO for 20 minutes) in random order at least 72 hours apart. Lung function was assessed pre and post-exercise (immediately, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes post). Participants completed a questionnaire 24 and 48 hours post-exercise to determine the occurrence of late phase symptoms. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used for analysis. RESULTS: A greater decline in FEV1 was observed for MICE as compared to MIIE and HIIE (11.0%, 4.9%, 5.8%, respectively, p<0.01); the decline did not differ between MIIE and HIIE (NS). Moderate/severe symptoms of coughing (n=5), wheezing (n=3), shortness of breath (n=2), sore/dry itchy throat (n=2), chest tightness (n=3), increased mucous production (n=3), and sleep disturbances (n=2) were reported following the MICE. Slight/severe symptoms of coughing (n=4), wheezing (n=3), shortness of breath (n=2), sore/dry itchy throat (n=1), chest tightness (n=2), increased mucous production (n=3), and sleep disturbances (n=1) were reported following HIIE. Shortness of breath (n=2) was reported following MIIE. CONCLUSION: MICE appears to trigger bronchoconstriction in those with confirmed AHR; the changes in lung function are both statistically and clinically relevant. Both HIIE and MICE are associated with self-reported late phase symptoms. Interval exercise does not appear to trigger bronchoconstriction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→