Wood-cement compatibility of some Eastern Canadian woods by isothermal calorimetry.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The compatibility of five softwood species (white pine, jack pine, balsam fir, black spruce, tamarack), five hardwood species (aspen, sugar maple, yellow birch, white birch, American beech), and black spruce bark with type 10 Portland cement was evaluated with the aim of selecting those most suited for the manufacture of wood-cement composite panels, after seasonning. The experiments were performed by isothermal microcalorimetry. From the trend observed, sofwood species showed the greatest potential for the manufacture of wood-cement panels, with a compatibility factor higher than 40 percent; whereas the hardwood species had a compatibility factor lower than 35 percent. Black spruce bark proved to be unsuitable for the manufacture of wood-cement panels, with a compatibility factor of 2 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it