MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464620813 · doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000154

Preparing for the Ostomy Certification Exam

2015· article· en· W2464620813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leanne Richbourg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStoma care and complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationMedicineMedical educationStudy guideObjective structured clinical examinationNursingPsychologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nurses preparing for a certification examination commonly ask, “What content should I study?” The Wound Ostomy Continence Nursing Certification Board (WOCNCB) certification examinations all have examination content outlines. Many potential certificants may wonder how the WOCNCB determines what subjects and tasks to include on our examinations; such decisions are guided by a role delineation study. The WOCNCB conducts a role delineation study every 5 years by surveying WOCNCB-certified practicing wound, ostomy, continence (WOC), and foot care (FC) nurses to gather data related to the tasks, knowledge, skills, and abilities they are using in performing their WOC and FC nurse professional roles. The electronic data collection tool measures both the frequency and the importance of specific activities performed by the clinician. From the information collected, the statisticians from our examination vendor are able to statistically identify entry-level tasks, knowledge, skills, and abilities of the WOC and FC nurse. These data form the basis of the WOCNCB examination content outline. Content outlines are included in the examination preparation handbooks available on the WOCNCB Web site at http://www.wocncb.org/certification/wound-ostomy-continence/eligibility. Certification examination questions are written based on the examination content outline. The process assures that each examination has content validity and is congruent with current clinical practice. The examination content outline is also the framework used in creation of the WOCNCB Ostomy Flashcards, which became available in early 2015. Testing has a direct effect on knowledge retention. Using flashcards to study is a form of retesting. Research has shown that retesting is superior to restudying in terms of skill and/or knowledge acquisition and retention. The retrieval of information that occurs when one answers a test question (be it on a WOCNCB flashcard or a WOCNCB self-assessment examination) strengthens one's memory of that information.1 Task 6 on the ostomy examination content outline refers to the assessment and management of continent fecal diversions. Examples of these are the Kock pouch, Barnett continent intestinal reservoir, or ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Although the IPAA is currently the most commonly performed procedure for ulcerative colitis treatment, the ostomy specialist job analysis identified the need to be familiar with other surgical options. 1. Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M, et al. Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ. 2011;45:1101–1110. Practice Questions 1. The Kock pouch is a: Continent colon pouch Incontinent pelvic pouch Continent ileal pouch Incontinent cecal pouch Content Outline: Task 6a Cognitive Domain: Recall The correct answer is C. The ostomy nurse must recognize that a Kock Pouch is a continent ileal reservoir. While this procedure has waned in popularity, it is still performed, especially in patients who wish to be converted from an ileostomy or have experienced failure of a pelvic pouch. Approximately 45 cm of terminal ileum is used, 30 cm to construct the reservoir and 15 cm to create the intussuscepted continence mechanism. Cohen Z. A tribute to Nils G. Kock, 1924-2011. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2012;55(3):153–4. Doughty D. History of stoma creation and surgical advances. In: Colwell JC, Goldberg MT, Carmel JE, ed. Fecal & Urinary Diversions: Management and Principles. St Louis: Mosby; 2004:8–10,97. 2. After the first stage of a 3-staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA procedure, the most important information that the ostomy nurse must teach the patient is: How to irrigate the continent pouch How to apply an ostomy appliance How to protect the perianal skin How to recognize symptoms of pouchitis Content Outline: Task 6b Cognitive Domain: Application The correct answer is B. The ostomy nurse should understand the steps of a 3-stage procedure for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Stage 1—Subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy Stage 2—Ileoanal pouch anastomosis with loop ileostomy Stage 3—Ileostomy closure The patient will need to understand how to apply an ostomy pouch and empty the stool from it. The other information is not critical until after the third surgery. Heppell J. Surgical management of ulcerative colitis. Up to Date. 2014. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/surgical-management-of-ulcerative-colitis?source=machineLearning&search=ileal+pouch+anal+anastomosis&selectedTitle=2%7E24§ionRank=1&anchor=H165136853#H165136853. Accessed November 19, 2014. Kiran RP, Fazio VW. Inflammatory bowel disease: surgical management. In: Colwell JC, Goldberg MT, Carmel JE, eds. Fecal & Urinary Diversions: Management and Principles. St Louis: Mosby; 2004:93–95. 3. At the 6-month follow-up appointment after IPAA surgery, a patient reports vague symptoms of pelvic discomfort, low-grade fever, diarrhea, and anorexia. She reports that she has just returned from a vacation in London. The ostomy nurse suspects the most likely cause of the symptoms is: Pouchitis Clostridium difficile infection Recurrent inflammatory bowel disease Dehydration Content Outline: Task 6c Cognitive Domain: Analysis The correct answer is A. Pouchitis is the most prevalent long-term complication after the IPAA. It is an idiopathic inflammatory condition occurring in up to 50% of patients after the IPAA for ulcerative colitis. It is believed to be caused by the interactions between the patient's immune system and the overgrowth of bacteria present in the pouch. Symptoms include tenesmus, diarrhea, pelvic discomfort, hematochezia, malaise, low-grade fever, and anorexia. C. difficile infection occurs most commonly after a course of antibiotic therapy. A restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA surgery eliminates the inflammatory bowel disease. The most common symptoms of dehydration include thirst, dry mucous membranes, decreased urine output, muscle cramps, and lethargy. Kiran RP, Fazio VW. Inflammatory bowel disease: surgical management. In: Colwell JC, Goldberg MT, Carmel JE, eds. Fecal & Urinary Diversions: Management and Principles. St Louis: Mosby; 2004:95. Landy J, Al-Hassi HO, McLaughlin SD, et al. Etiology of pouchitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(6):1146–1155.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wound Ostomy and Continence NursingSame topicStoma care and complicationsFrench-language works237,207