MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464654995 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1599

A high reliability survey of discrete Epoch of Reionization foreground sources in the MWA EoR0 field

2016· article· en· W2464654995 on OpenAlexaff
P. Carroll, J. Line, M. F. Morales, N. Barry, Adam P. Beardsley, B. J. Hazelton, Daniel Jacobs, J. C. Pober, Ian Sullivan, R. L. Webster, G. Bernardi, Judd D. Bowman, F. Briggs, R. J. Cappallo, B. E. Corey, A. de Oliveira‐Costa, Joshua S. Dillon, D. Emrich, Aaron Ewall‐Wice, L. Feng, B. M. Gaensler, R. Goeke, L. J. Greenhill, Jacqueline N. Hewitt, N. Hurley‐Walker, M. Johnston‐Hollitt, D. L. Kaplan, J. C. Kasper, Hacksung Kim, E. Kratzenberg, E. Lenc, Abraham Loeb, C. J. Lonsdale, M. J. Lynch, B. McKinley, S. R. McWhirter, D. A. Mitchell, E. Morgan, Abraham R. Neben, Divya Oberoi, A. R. Offringa, S. M. Ord, Sourabh Paul, B. Pindor, T. Prabu, P. Procopio, J. Riding, A. E. E. Rogers, D. Anish Roshi, N. Udaya Shankar, S. K. Sethi, K. S. Srivani, R. Subrahmanyan, Max Tegmark, Nithyanandan Thyagarajan, S. J. Tingay, Cathryn M. Trott, M. Waterson, R. B. Wayth, A. R. Whitney, A. Williams, C. L. Williams, Chen Wu, J. Stuart B. Wyithe

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReionizationPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxySkySource countsCOSMIC cancer databaseSpectral indexAstronomyRedshiftSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of the epoch of reionization H I signal requires a precise understanding of the intervening galaxies and AGN, both for instrumental calibration and foreground removal. We present a catalogue of 7394 extragalactic sources at 182 MHz detected in the RA = 0 field of the Murchison Widefield Array Epoch of Reionization observation programme. Motivated by unprecedented requirements for precision and reliability we develop new methods for source finding and selection. We apply machine learning methods to self-consistently classify the relative reliability of 9490 source candidates. A subset of 7466 are selected based on reliability class and signal-to-noise ratio criteria. These are statistically cross-matched to four other radio surveys using both position and flux density information. We find 7369 sources to have confident matches, including 90 partially resolved sources that split into a total of 192 sub-components. An additional 25 unmatched sources are included as new radio detections. The catalogue sources have a median spectral index of -0.85. Spectral flattening is seen towards lower frequencies with a median of -0.71 predicted at 182 MHz. The astrometric error is 7 arcsec compared to a 2.3 arcmin beam FWHM. The resulting catalogue covers 1400 deg 2 and is complete to approximately 80 mJy within half beam power. This provides the most reliable discrete source sky model available to date in the MWA EoR0 field for precision foreground subtraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207