Marchandisation de l’hébergement des personnes âgées et enjeux éthiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La privatisation des services de santé et des services sociaux soulève d’importants débats éthiques. Dans ce contexte, la très forte expansion des résidences privées pour personnes âgées suscite des inquiétudes quant au respect des droits des résidents : liberté individuelle, qualité de vie, accès aux soins et protection contre les abus. Se basant sur une étude qualitative et quantitative réalisée au Québec, cet article présente l’opinion des acteurs du réseau public et des propriétaires de résidences privées sur ces enjeux éthiques. Les résultats rendent compte de visions très différentes mais révèlent un consensus quant à la pertinence d’une intervention de l’État. Au-delà des préjugés, l’auteure souhaite alimenter le débat sur les impacts de cette marchandisation des services auprès des personnes âgées vulnérables et de ceux qui les accompagnent au quotidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".