Stolen bicycles and exploited children: Italian cinema and its relation to the cinema of independent India (1947–1977)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The years that follow the end of World War II mark a unique historical-political situation shared by India and Italy. The debate in both nations looks at cinematic neo-realism as the regenerating force capable of leading towards a renewed cultural life after the events of decolonization and partition on the one side, and the disasters of fascism and the destructions of the war on the other. Neo-realism is seen as the best possible choice for intellectuals and film-makers in both countries. The new role of the artist suggested by the works of Italian neo-realism (especially Bicycle Thieves [De Sica, 1948]) is perceived by Indian intellectuals as the right solution for the renewal. This article searches for references and stylistic echoes found in the complex body of Indian cinema. The methodological approach of the article, therefore, relies both on intertextuality and on the analysis of some writings where one finds reference to views and concepts on cinema clearly inspired by the strategies and the ideology of Italian neo-realism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".