MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464720742 · doi:10.1002/srin.200505988

Innovative Flexible Metal Forming Processes based on Hybrid Thermo‐Mechanical Interaction

2005· article· en· W2464720742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuesteel research international · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Forming Simulation Techniques
Canadian institutionsForming Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGradationFormabilityMaterials scienceForming processesProcess (computing)ThermalProperty (philosophy)Mechanical engineeringReduction (mathematics)Sheet metalMaterial propertiesResidual stressStructural engineeringComposite materialComputer scienceEngineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach towards functional gradation of structural parts is presented. This approach is based on the utilization of locally varying thermo‐mechanically coupled effects applied to different initial workpiece geometries. The possible degree of freedom for the gradation of material properties and geometrical shape for sheet metal forming applications as well as for parts produced by bulk metal forming is characterized by the results of metallographic investigations, by mechanical testing and by an indication of the remaining residual stress state. On the basis of experimental results and process simulations, it could be revealed that the ability to exactly control the dynamic microstructural evolution by thermal and mechanical process parameters combined with predefined material design parameters constitutes a key towards the adjustment of flexible material property profiles even for parts with complex three‐dimensional geometry. Beyond that, the integrative aspect of thermal and mechanical treatment already implies the high level of obtainable efficiency resulting from shortening of process chains. However, it is not only the ability to integrate shape generation and property gradation, but also the automatically included positive effect of tailoring process behaviour by a gradation of formability finally allowing to improve process efficiency e.g. by a reduction of forming steps or reduction of (local) tool load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it