MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2464877376 · doi:10.7146/aul.29.49

Komparativ undersøgelse af læreres tilegnelse af specialpædagogiske kompetencer gennem uddannelse (Danmark, Canada/Ontario, Finland, og Sverige): Rapport til Formandskabet for Skolerådet

2012· report· da· W2464877376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Tetler, Lotte Hedegaard‐Sørensen, Laura Mørk Emtoft, Hilde Ulvseth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageda
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Educational Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Denne komparative undersøgelse af læreres tilegnelse af specialpædagogiske kompetencer gennem uddannelse i Danmark, Canada/Ontario, Finland og Sverige er gennemført i 2012 på foranledning af Formandskabet for Skolerådet. Studiet er gennemført i perioden marts‐november 2012 af et forskerteam ved Institut for Uddannelse og Pædagogik, Aarhus Universitet (DPU). Dette team har fået hjælp til opgaven af en videnskabelig følgegruppe samt repræsentanter fra de involverede uddannelsesinstitutioner i de fire lande. Undersøgelsen er en totalundersøgelse, dvs. en undersøgelse af samtlige grund- og efteruddannelsessteder i Danmark, Canada/Ontario, Sverige og Finland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Educational SciencesFrench-language works237,207