Differential calculus on topological spaces with weak Markov structure I
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of a weak Markov set takes its origin from Whitney problems for differentiable functions on \mathbb R^n . In the present paper we study a version of the first Whitney problem of characterizing families of continuous functions satisfying certain differential relations on weak Markov sets. To this end we develop differential calculus on weak Markov sets similar to that on open subsets of \mathbb R^n . Then we show that some classical results for smooth functions and differential forms (such as Poincaré lemma, de Rham and Hartogs theorems, Künneth formulas, etc.) are valid also on certain weak Markov sets and more generally certain topological spaces with weak Markov structures. The class of such spaces includes, in particular, C^{\infty} manifolds with boundaries and some Lipschitz and fractal topological manifolds. Thus the paper offers yet another approach to analysis on fractals, a developing area of modern mathematics that focuses on geometric and dynamical aspects of fractals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it