En eaux troubles : la relation mère-fille dans l’œuvre d’Irène Némirovsky
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irène Némirovsky entame sa carrière dans l'entre-deux-guerres, période qui a connu l'essor d'une nouvelle science : la psychanalyse. Les théories de Sigmund Freud se répandent en Europe et, c'est au lendemain de la Première Guerre que la psychanalyse commence son travail de séduction et d’influence sur l’ensemble des Lettres françaises. Les écrivains en France sont fascinés par cette nouvelle science et leur production littéraire en recèle les traces. Némirovsky ne fait pas exception à cette liste, et si son œuvre est éclectique et diverse, il n'en reste pas moins que son fil conducteur restera un thème essentiel de la psychanalyse: celui de la relation à la mère. Cet article propose d'analyser le rapport mère-fille comme représenté dans les romans et nouvelles de Némirovsky, en faisant un survol rapide de son œuvre. Mon hypothèse est que Némirovsky se positionne dans un refus et un rejet de la figure maternelle, ce qui devient le catalyseur de sa venue à l'écriture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".