MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465236777 · doi:10.5430/jbgc.v6n2p7

Evaluation of magnetic field homogeneity using in-out signal cycle mapping in gradient recalled echo images of a mixed water/oil phantom as a rough indication for daily quality control

2016· article· en· W2465236777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneity (statistics)Imaging phantomScannerMathematicsPixelNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceNuclear medicineOpticsPhysicsMedicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Magnetic field (B 0 ) homogeneity is important for the performance of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. Traditionally, B 0 homogeneity was measured using the spectral peak or phase-mapping methods. However, these procedures are not generally accessible to the MRI operator and are rarely performed routinely. This study proposes a novel method for measuring B 0 homogeneity that can be implemented in daily quality control (QC). Methods: When a uniformly mixed water/oil phantom was imaged using a gradient recalled echo (GRE) pulse sequence, the signal intensity dynamically changed with echo time (TE). From this, the resonant frequency was calculated with a simplex curve-fitting algorithm on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The standard deviation of resonant frequency (SD) was used as the index of B 0 homogeneity. The appropriate TE pattern and feasibility of B 0 homogeneity evaluation were examined. Results: Over seven TEs (choosing nominal in-phase, out-phase, and the midpoints of both) were required to measure stable SD in a 1.5-T scanner. As B 0 homogeneity worsened, the SD became larger at the off-center position. Although a positive correlation was observed with the width of the spectral peak obtained by the phase-difference method, the SD value was about 5 × 10 4 times greater. Therefore, SD can be used only as an index of B 0 homogeneity. Similar results were obtained using a 0.3-T scanner. A map and SD can be obtained by acquiring several GRE images of a water/oil mixed phantom within a few minutes. Conclusions: In-out signal cycle mapping can be easily implemented for daily QC in all MRI scanners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it