MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465314652 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00145

Layered TiS<sub>2</sub> Positive Electrode for Mg Batteries

2016· article· en· W2465314652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBasic Energy Sciences
KeywordsElectrodeMaterials scienceNanotechnologyMetallurgyOptoelectronicsChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnesium batteries are a good candidate for high energy storage systems, but the limited discovery of functional positive electrode materials beyond the seminal Chevrel phase (Mo 6 S 8 ) has slowed their development. Herein, we report on layered TiS 2 as a promising positive electrode intercalation material, providing 115 mAh g –1 stabilized capacity in a Mg full cell. Reversible Mg 2+ intercalation into the structure is proven by elemental analysis combined with X-ray diffraction studies that elucidate the phase behavior upon cycling. The voltage profiles reveal distinct Mg 2+ cation ordering, unlike the solid solution behavior exhibited by Li + . Our findings not only point to the important role of “soft” lattices to facilitate divalent solid-state cation mobility but also now provide an alternative sulfide to serve as a platform for the fundamental understanding of Mg 2+ intercalation in lattices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it