Addressing Physical Health Needs of Individuals With Schizophrenia Using Orem’s Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People with schizophrenia have increased morbidity and mortality rates associated with poor physical health that requires a holistic and comprehensive nursing approach. Dorothy Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory (SCDNT) has made a substantive contribution to nursing by focusing on people as whole entities who engage with their environment to sustain health. We offer an expanded view of the SCDNT by showing how it is a useful framework for nurses to integrate interpretive, empirical, and critical theoretical perspectives for addressing both the physical and mental health needs for people with schizophrenia. Understanding patient needs through different theoretical lenses will help nurses integrate high-quality, evidence-based care with patients' realities, needs, and values while considering the influence of the broader sociopolitical context. We demonstrate how the SCDNT allows nurses incorporate a critical perspective for critiquing the influence of societal barriers on individual's health and advocate for initiatives to address the complex sociopolitical, economic, and contextual factors that affect the physical well-being of individuals with schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".