MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465484988

Gadamera doświadczenie i teoria wychowania: uczenie się, że inny może mieć rację

2015· article· pl· W2465484988 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKwartalnik Pedagogiczny · 2015
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHermeneuticsOpenness to experienceConversationEpistemologyPhilosophyHumanismSociologyLifelong learningPedagogyTheologyPsychologySocial psychologyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article (original title: Gadamer’s Experience and Theory of Education: Learning that the Other May Be Right) was published in Education, Dialogue and Hermeneutics edited by Paul Fairfield (2011). In the text a hermeneutic concept of education is drawn from Hans-Georg Gadamer’s education and philosophical hermeneutics. Jean Grondin underlines the importance of the culture of question, dialogue with tradition and vibrant humanism in the thinking about education within philosophical hermeneutics of Gadamer. Sensus communis and an openness that the other might be right seems to be a kind of a solid foundation of education which according to Gadamer is a self-education within lifelong lasting conversation with the other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.350
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.093 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it