«Принцип функциональности» в канадской внешней политике: к вопросу об истоках формирования концепта
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fundamental ideas and the main stages of one of the basic concepts of Canadian foreign policy, “the principle of functionality” are considered. In the first half of the 20 th century, Canada was in process of searching for its foreign policy orientation in world politics. The necessity to find the balance between its own national interests and positions of leading world powers, especially Britain and the United States, determined the creation of basics of the concept of “functionality” as one of the basic constructs of Canadian foreign policy practice. “The principle of functionality” was a concept allowing two basic characteristics of the state, namely the “opportunity” to contribute to the development of the international community and “direct interest” of the state in addressing a particular issue in determining its place in the system of international relations. “The principle of functionality” was initially difficult adaptable to the realities of world politics at the time, and Canada has suffered a series of setbacks in the process of its implementation in practice. But, nevertheless, it allowed Canada to declare itself as an independent actor in international relations. In the future, these ideas formed the basis for defining other Canadian foreign policy concept of “middle powers”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it