MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465559788

Clarifying Amplitude Envelope’s Crucial Role in Auditory Perception

2016· article· en· W2465559788 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Michael Schutz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMultisensory perception and integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPerceptionEnvelope (radar)AmplitudeAuditory systemComputer scienceAcousticsNatural (archaeology)Auditory perceptionAuditory scene analysisSpeech recognitionPsychologyCognitive psychologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsGeographyNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La plus grande partie de la recherche du laboratoire MAPLE explore le rôle de l'enveloppe d'amplitude -la «forme» d'un son au fil du temps.Le système de perception est sensible aux changements dynamiques dans les enveloppes d'amplitude des sons naturels, lesquels transmettent des informations importantes sur les événements et les sources.Toutefois l'étude de la perception auditive utilise souvent des tonalités d'amplitudes fixes dépourvus de telles informations.Nos études ont documentés des cas dans lesquels la recherche fondée fortement sur de tels sons néglige certain des aspects principaux et des capacités du système de perception.Ici, je résume certains de ces travaux et les lignes directrices des orientations futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicMultisensory perception and integrationFrench-language works237,207