MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465567614 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0128

TDEM simulation and analysis of thermal conduction through packed granular beds

2016· article· en· W2465567614 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nan Gui, Xingtuan Yang, Jiyuan Tu, Shengyao Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal conductionThermal diffusivityThermal conductivityGranular materialThermalParticle sizeVoid (composites)Particle (ecology)Granular matterThermal insulationComposite materialMechanicsPorosityPhysicsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work deals with evaluation and simulation of the thermal discrete element method (TDEM) for particle–particle collision and thermal conduction in a packed bed. The effects of different granular properties, such as particle size, stiffness factor or compression degree, thermal diffusivity, void fraction or concentrations, and packing states, on the thermal conduction and insulation characteristics of granular assembly are discussed. The thermal conductivity and diffusion still play dominant roles in the overall thermal conduction and insulation of the granular bed. However, it is also indicated that increasing compression degree, reducing particle size and void concentration will increase the thermal conduction throughout the granular materials, and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207