MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effect of Energy Status on Distance Running Performance Across a Competitive Season in Female Cross-country Runners

2015· article· en· W2465605408 on OpenAlexaff
Heather C. M. Allaway, Nancy I. Williams, Jenna C. Gibbs, Mary Jane De Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyRepeated measures designAnimal scienceAnalysis of varianceObservational studyAfrican americanPhysical therapyInternal medicineBiologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female cross-country runners are at a higher risk for chronic energy deficiency (ED). Cross-sectional evidence demonstrates the negative effects of ED on surrogate markers of performance. The association between chronic ED and distance running performance in female cross-country runners across a season is unclear. PURPOSE: To examine competitive 5km time trial performance across a season in female cross-country runners categorized by energy status. METHODS: 18 female cross-country runners (19.5 ± 0.3 yrs, 54.6 ± 1.4 kg, 61.2 ± 1.7 mL/kg/min) participated in this prospective observational study across a 10-12 week competitive season. Outcome measures were assessed pre and post-season. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured using indirect calorimetry and compared to the Harris Benedict predicted REE (REE/pREE) as a marker of ED. Performance was assessed during an outdoor 5km time trial. Fasting blood samples were assayed for total triiodothyronine (TT3). Repeated measures ANOVA were performed to compare log TT3 and 5km time trial outcomes across the season among participants grouped by tertiles (n=6 each group) of pre-season REE/pREE (severe ED (SED; REE/pREE<0.84), moderate ED (MED; 0.84≤REE/pREE<0.90), and energy replete (ER; REE/pREE≥0.90)). RESULTS: There was a significant group effect (p=0.004), however no time or interaction effects (p>0.49) were observed for the 5km time trial. Pre-season the SED group was 4.1s (p=0.005) slower vs the MED group, while no differences were observed between the ER and the SED or MED groups (p>0.1). Post-season the SED group was 3.7s (p=0.002) and 2.6s (p=0.023) slower vs the MED and ER groups, respectively. For log TT3 there were no significant time or group effects (p>0.15), however a trend toward a significant interaction effect (p=0.097) was observed. Pre-season log TT3 was lower (p=0.043) in the SED vs MED groups, a trend to significance (p=0.067) was observed between the SED and ER groups, with no difference between the ER and MED groups. Log TT3 was not different between groups post-season (p=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of decrements in 5km time trial performance in severely ED female cross-country runners. Early detection of severe ED utilizing REE may be a strategy for preventing suboptimal distance running performance across a competitive season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→