A Multi-Objective Model Oriented Mapping Approach for NoC-based Computing Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a multi-objective, i.e., reliability, communication energy, performance, co-optimization model oriented mapping approach is proposed to find optimal mappings when applications are mapped onto network-on-chip (NoC) based reconfigurable architectures. A co-optimization model, defined as reliability efficiency model (REM), is developed to evaluate the overall reliability efficiency of a mapping. In REM, reliability efficiency is defined as the reliability profit at the same energy latency product. Based on REM, a mapping approach, referred to as priority and compensation factor oriented branch and bound (PCBB), is introduced to figure out the best mapping pattern. Two techniques, priority allocation and compensation factor utilization, are adopted to make a tradeoff between search efficiency and accuracy. Experimental results show that the proposed approach has three major contributions compared to state-of-the-art approaches. (1) PCBB is highly efficient in finding best mappings, with a 3x and 720x speedup compared to branch and bound (BB) and simulated annealing (SA). (2) PCBB is able to dynamically remap after the reconfiguration of the architecture. (3) General quantitative evaluation for reliability, communication energy and performance are made respectively before integrated into the unified model REM, whereas other similar models only touch upon two of them quantitatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it