Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les problèmes que l’on désigne le plus souvent aujourd’hui par le terme « intégration » sont au coeur de la recherche sur l’immigration. Cependant, la plupart des études sur ce thème sont dominées par une approche empiriste reposant sur un ensemble de définitions vagues et dont le sens varie d’un auteur à l’autre. Les inconvénients d’ordre scientifique, mais aussi d’ordre pratique, qui découlent de cette situation rendent nécessaire l’approfondissement de la réflexion théorique. Celle-ci doit s’appuyer sur les analyses développées au début du siècle autour du concept d’assimilation, aux États-Unis (par les sociologues de Chicago) et en France (par Émile Durkheim), en essayant d’articuler des problématiques qui paraissent plus complémentaires que contradictoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it