MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2465924420 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v9n5p257

Money Laundering in Iran’s Law and International Document

2016· article· en· W2465924420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ghafoor Khoyini, Hamid Masjed Sarayi, Soheil Kabiri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoney launderingCriminalizationJurisprudenceLawPossession (linguistics)Political scienceConventionConfiscationProperty (philosophy)Law and economicsBusinessSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Money laundering or money laundering is a set of operations which transform the illegitimate and illegal property to legitimate and legal property and This phenomenon is one of transnational organized crime that has detrimental effect and impacts on the local and international level in the fields of social, political, economic and security and for this reason, many international conventions including the Vienna and the Palermo Convention have stressed to criminalize and combat it and in domestic law to combat money laundering as a crime have been considered by the law. In Jurisprudence (figh) there are verses, traditions and legal rules, which demonstrate criminalization of this phenomenon; this paper, in detail discussed this Jurisprudence reasons; as well as relationship of money laundering with Khums(one-fifth) of lawful property mixed with forbidden money and conflict of Criminalization of money laundering with some important Islamic legal principles such as The presumption of ownership and Possession of owner to his property have been pointed and investigated. So this study, analyzed the Jurisprudence foundations of the money laundering case and the prohibition of it has been concluded.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207